The end of Tesla is nigh
(No, this is not about Musk supporting a racist, homophobic, bigoted authoritarian – others will write endlessly about that today)
Tesla is valued as a software company, not a car company. This is an image they’ve pushed endlessly – they’re “further ahead”.
Their cars will be self-driving in 2016 .. sorry, 2017. No, 2018. 2019 it is – promise! Your Tesla will robotaxi and make you rich while you sleep in 2020. Here’s full FSD for everybody in 2021. I meant 2022 …
The truth is, as every other carmaker has tried telling you, Tesla isn’t further ahead. They’re just more careless. Musk – in his ignorance (he isn’t some technical genius) – simply stated that since a human can drive a car with only our eyes as input (not true, but let’s go with that for now) a Tesla should also be able to do it by using cameras only.
The latest FSD version is “more aggressive”, “runs red lights”, “doesn’t slow down for pedestrians”. And this shows that Musk has finally realized he can’t keep the stock price scam up by “soon, trust me bro!” promises anymore.
FSD is pretty much useless outside of well-behaved roads. Up until now, as soon as you enter city traffic it’s “too careful”, “breaks suddenly”, “surprises other cars and you get rear-ended” etc. This is because up to this point there have been people who care about safety still able to make their voices heard, however, progress on solving these issues has stalled.
The reason for which is obvious. Humans can drive cars using our eyes (and other senses) only because we possess human level intelligence (!). We’re constantly predicting the actions of others. How people “usually act”. “That driver has probably”. “Uh that child’s completely occupied with their phone” …
… the thing Musk needed for Tesla’s FSD bet was AGI – Artificial General Intelligence – Human level AI. I don’t think he realized this, and I still don’t think he has, though.
Other carmakers know that the only full self driving you’ll get is in certain settings, restricted to well mapped roads, with plenty of additional sensors making up for the fact that the car’s software cannot do all the things a human driver does naturally.
Musk just widened the above mentioned careless FSD beta to a lot more people. The results are hilarious, in a sad way. My best guess is that there’s one recent precedence for why he might think this could work; the Autopilot headlights farce. “We just need more data, so force-enable this non-working function for everybody since they’re otherwise not using it”.
Back then, for a few weeks every single Tesla out on the roads blinded other drivers. The next software update indeed had pretty much working headlights automation though. At about the same level as other carmakers’.
There’s a slight difference between “blinding other drivers” and “crashing into other drivers”.
Not that Musk cares. He’s just trying to save the stock price from crashing when “trust me bro” doesn’t work anymore.
/Tesla-driver since 2020
Create your own locally hosted family AI assistant
What you’re seeing in this picture is a screenshot from our “family chat”. It’s a locally hosted Matrix server, with Element clients on all the computers, phones and tablets in the family. Fully End2End encrypted of course – why should our family discussions end up with some external party?
You’re also seeing “Karen”, our family AI, taking part in the discussions with some helpful input when so prompted.
Karen is based on the LLaMa 13b 4-bit GPTQ locally hosted LLM (Large Language Model) I mentioned in a previous post. Thanks to Facebook/Meta releasing this model there’s a very active development community working on it at the moment, and I’m making use of a few of those projects to be able to make this happen.
- GPTQ-for-LLaMa – quantizes the original weights of the 13b model down to something that fits a 12GB VRAM GPU
- text-generation-webui – implements a Gradio based Web/API interface to LLaMa et. al.
While I’ve written the glue between our Matrix chat and the text-generation-webui API myself I make use of a very nifty little utility:
- mnotify – allows regular unix cli interfacing to Matrix channels
… and so my code is simply a bunch of Bash shellscripting and a cut down version of the websocket chat example Python code from text-generation-webui. The way I’ve written it I can change context (see below) dynamically during the conversation, for example depending on who is prompting the bot.
Context? Well, yes. This is something not well explained when people just use LLMs like GPT. The model itself contains “knowledge”, but a lot of what creates the experience possible is due to what context is supplied – text included with every interaction influencing the inference and massively changing the tone and content of the responses. This is for example the context I currently use with Karen:
“You are a question answering bot named Karen that is able to answer questions about the world. You are extremely smart, knowledgeable, capable, and helpful. You always give complete, accurate, and very detailed responses to questions, and never stop a response in mid-sentence or mid-thought.”
You might also be able to guess at a few other contexts that might come into action, explaining why the bot is named as it is.
So what’s on the horizon for this technology at the moment?
Well, there are implementations of both Whisper (voice-to-text) and Tortoise-TTS (text-to-speech) in the works so next up I guess I need to make this into a locally hosted “Siri / Alexa”. Just to be clear, if I do, it _will_ be activated with -“Computer.”.
The delta between an LLM and consciousness
With Facebook’s release of LLaMa, and the subsequent work done with its models by the open community, it’s now possible to run a state of the art “GPT-3 class” LLM on regular consumer hardware. The 13B model, quantized to 4-bit, runs fine on a GPU with ~9GB free VRAM.
I spent 40 minutes chatting with one yesterday, and the experience was almost flawless.
So why is Troed playing around with locally hosted LLM “chatbots”?
No, not just because they’re hilarious ;) I spent a good amount of time a decade ago on current research on consciousness. Esp. Susan Blackmore’s book series, and Douglas Hofstadter’s “I am a strange loop” made a large impact onto what I consider to be “my” theory on what consciousness is, and what the difference is between “more or less smart”, both within humans as well as between humans and other animals.
I believe the way these LLMs work is close, in a way, to how humans store and recall “memories”. Since these bots work with language, and language is how we communicate, that allows them to partly capture “memories” through how they’re described.
What – I think – would be the steps from an LLM into something that could be … conscious?
- Crystalization: An LLM today is trained on a dataset, which isn’t then updated with use. Humans acquire new knowledge into our working memories and then (likely when sleeping) this knowledge modifies our “trained dataset” for subsequent use.
- Exploration: This is one of the differences between animals and humans (and within humans). How many “future possibilities” are we exploring before we act/answer. “If I do/say this, then they might do/say that …”. Exploration affects future interactions. An LLM can “explore” answering a question differently using different seeds, but there’s no feedback on the value of likely responses.
- Noise: An idle LLM does nothing. A human brain is never idle. We’re constantly getting noisy input from audible sources, air moving against the hairs on our body etc. There’s a stream of low level noise into our neural networks, which causes thoughts and dreams. Those thoughts and dreams cause other thoughts and dreams, in a loop. All of these thoughts and dreams modify our experiences. Likewise, an LLM needs to “experience” things happening also when idle to be able to evolve a persona.
- Persistence: An LLM today is used by booting it up from it’s trained dataset, generating a session of interaction, and is then turned off again. To be able to hold on to a consistent persona the LLM would need to … not be killed over and over.
I think the four points above will give rise to something that would be “conscious” in some aspects, and I don’t think we’re too far off from seeing it happen.
Rootless Docker and home folder shenanigans
Docker is a powerful tool for managing and deploying applications, but it can sometimes be frustrating to work with. In this post, I want to share my experience with a recent issue I had with rootless Docker, and what I did to resolve it.
I was working on a project when I suddenly realized that a Dockerfile wouldn’t build on my regular desktop user account. Any command that I ran after the FROM command would just spit out “invalid argument”. I was confused, because I have multiple users on this machine running Docker and my main user was the only one with any issues.
I spent a long time comparing the output of the docker info command between different accounts. Eventually, I noticed that all the working ones were using the overlay2 filesystem, while the one that wasn’t working was using vfs. It didn’t take too long to realize that my main user is the only one with an encrypted $home directory, which meant that using it as the data directory for Docker was not possible.
To fix the issue, I created a ~/.config/docker/daemon.json file containing an entry for data-root that pointed to a directory outside of the encrypted $home. This allowed the overlay2 filesystem to be used again, and I was able to build the Dockerfile without any issues.
I’m not sure why this issue ever worked before, but it’s possible that it was because I was running Docker in a different way (e.g. without rootless mode). I searched online for solutions to this problem, but I didn’t find many helpful hints. In the end, I had to figure it out on my own.
In conclusion, working with Docker can be challenging at times, but with some perseverance and a willingness to experiment, you can overcome most issues. In my case, the solution was to use a different filesystem and to point to a non-encrypted data directory. I’m glad that I was able to figure it out, and I hope that my experience can help others who may be facing similar issues.
***
Did this post seem a bit out of character for me? Well, then you should go read the original Mastodon thread. This writeup comes courtesy of ChatGPT, asked to rewrite said thread into an essay.
The Atari Mega ST keyboard – finally exposed
When people talk about the Atari ST range of computers, most mean the common form factor of the times where the computer and keyboard were all one unit. This was true for most of Atari’s machines – but for a few exceptions. The Mega ST, the Mega STE and the TT went for a more “business look”, which apparently meant separation of computer and keyboard. The Mega ST computer has a fantastic “pizza box” style, while the Mega STE and TT share a common … something else.
Another difference than just the looks were the keyboards. While the regular form factor had “mushy keys” these three models were praised for the tactile feel. There were (and are even today!) after market mods you could buy where you replaced the rubber domes beneath the keys of a regular ST to get the “TT feel”.
But one keyboard stands out, even here. While there’s very little information available when searching, the Mega ST keyboard is different from all the others (besides the looks, where it again is leaps beyond the Mega STE/TT style keyboards). While the Mega STE and TT relied on higher quality rubber domes, the Mega ST made use of one of the very first mechanic switches on the market – the Cherry MX Black. This means there’s no mylar, no domes – and since Cherry has stayed compatible up until this very day you can still buy replacement switches for your 35 year old Mega ST keyboard.
I did not know this before yesterday. I only knew that I had two Mega STE keyboards and one Mega ST (they’re interchangeable – connecting with an RJ12 plug) and I really really wanted to use the Mega ST keyboard but it had severe intermittent connection issues. Pressing a key sometimes generated a key press, sometimes not. Some keys worked better than others, but mostly it was a hit’n’miss how many times you needed to press a key to get a reaction.
What’s a geek to do.
It took only a few minutes to get down to a thick black metal frame topside, and a circuit board on the other side. The key caps could just be lifted off, but even after having removed all screws from the metal frame it wouldn’t budge from the pcb. I was expecting to be able to separate them getting access to a mylar at this point, which I had intended to fill in with a specific carbon dust mylar pad refresher. After some headscratching, and too much force, I realised that these black switches were soldered to the PCB. At the same time tIn on the #atariscne IRC channel pointed me to a page my own searches hadn’t turned up – where Atarian Computing details how the Mega ST keyboard uses Cherry MX Black switches. He, like me, had heard rumors but found any actual available information lacking.
Alright. At this point I decided I could just as well dismantle everything, documenting what I did and if needed buy a new set of switches. Since I really didn’t know anything about Cherry switches, I found a good page describing the differences. Atari had used the Cherry Blacks according to spec, which means the Space bar has a slightly stiffer Dark Grey. We thus have 93+1 switches in total. I looked up where to get replacements online, and quickly found out that mostly the 3 pin color LED variant is sold today, while what the Mega ST keyboard has is the 2 pin variant. This might not be a problem, I assume I could just cut the extra leg, but that felt like a waste. I also want to point out that already from the start Cherry supported a “pass through” wire, or diode, to aid the routing of signals for the keyboard manufactures. Atari did not make use of this, but if you buy 4 pin switches you can just remove that wire/diode and you’re left with the exact 2 pin switch you want.
When you’ve spent time restoring old retro computers, you develop a keen eye for “things to fix” that might not at all be what you were looking for. Here we can see that there are two electrolytic capacitors (2.2µf 50V and 100µf 16V) on the keyboard PCB, and with a max shelf life in the tens of years, those should always be replaced. I did think to test after having done so if that made a difference to the intermittent connection issues, but no.
The ZD-915 desolder gun made quick work of the switches, and I divided what I had up in dishwasher-safe (max 40 degrees C) and non-dishwasher safe parts. The switches themselves I dismantled, blew out with compressed air, and jet-sprayed with IPA inside the connector and put it through its motions, hoping that that would clear out any possible dirt or organic residue on the metal blades.
After that all I had to do was to solder everything back up, including a patch for that one switch I forcefully pulled without desoldering first, and I was greeted by a perfectly working, “mint condition”, Mega ST keyboard. The only real mechanical keyboard Atari ever made for its 16/32 bit computers – and an absolute joy to type on.
Sizecoding & custom packing
Update 2021-07-14: Ben of The Overlanders commented on my Facebook post that there was yet another optimization possible on the depack-routine. I have edited the source listing below.
This weekend yet another instance of the very popular Atari ST retro computer happening Sommarhack took place. Due to Covid-19, this year as well as last have been online-only events though. I decided to participate in one of the competitions, the 256 byte intro. This is what’s called sizecoding today, the art of writing something worthy of being shown off, yet you have very little actual room available to do so. On the Atari ST, the limit of 256 bytes excludes the operating system header which is normally 32 bytes in size.
The Atari ST, being 68000 based, is of course a 16 bit computer. There are no instructions smaller than a multiple of 16 bit, 2 bytes. A lot of instructions will be 4, 6 or even 8 bytes long in a regular program. We thus know, already from the start, that our program will not consist of more than 128 low level CPU instructions.
I decided I wanted to display text, and additionally I wanted to use a custom font. In a competition like this you would normally use pre-existing primitives available from the operating system, since you would get those “for free” without using any of the space you have available. A custom font would simply look better, and since the point of the intro I wanted to make was to display an http link, looks would be everything.
The graphics artist in my old group, BlueSTar, had already made an 8×8 pixel font back in 2015 that we had used in two previous releases. It was the obvious choice to use here as well, and so I knew what I now had to work with. The link would need 30 characters, of which 21 would be unique. The normal use of a font like this is to keep it in a lookup table, and simply reference the character you want to print to the screen. However, even having shrunk the full character set down to only the 21 I needed, when I added a minimal printing routine I got way too close to the 256 byte limit. The other option would be to just store the 30 characters in a screen friendly format, which would make for a smaller print routine. Also, none of the characters I needed from the font used the 8th line, so in the end I had 30 times 7 bytes of pure graphics data.
210 bytes.
I wrote up, and optimized, the print routine, the setting of a proper palette and some interrupt to get some movement on the otherwise static content. All that came in at 58 bytes. 210+58=268. 12 bytes over the limit. There were no more optimizations available at this stage, so I needed to look into packing the data. This might sound obvious in a world of ubiquitous ZIP and RAR, but it’s not that simple. The depacker will also need to fit, so I needed to find a way to pack data while at the same time gaining more free space from that packing than the depacking code needed.
Luckily, the same reason for why line 8 was not used by any of these characters would come help me again. In the 8 by 8 pixel square available for each character, none of them used the first column – or the eighth bit of each byte. The reason for this is of course that you should be able to write these 8×8 squares to the screen and automatically get space between characters and lines for readability.
My first test consisted of using bit 8 to mean “0x00” (a byte consisting of all zeroes, no pixels set) follows, in addition to the character otherwise using the lower bits. This got me very close, but not enough. After a few iterations of this concept, I decided that it was time to do something a bit more advanced. I switched to writing a custom packer in Java, which borrowed some concepts from the very capable lz77 algorithm. There would of course not be any room for a custom dictionary, and with only 210 bytes of source data it’s not likely to find some large lengths of duplicate bytes.
I developed a packer that would search for duplicates of 2 and 3 byte blocks, in the first 64 bytes of the data. If the highest bit was set, it together with the next highest bit decided if the position pointed to by the low 6 bits should be copied as 2 or 3 bytes. It would of course prioritize three byte blocks before two byte blocks, and all in all it was able to pack the 210 bytes of source data down to 168. The depacker got to be a bit complicated though, since I needed to store the length-bits and loop on those. At this point, I was able to get the intro under the limit, but I had an awful color cycling as the only available “movement”.
Somewhat disappointed, I decided to focus on the size of the depacker. Removing the possibility of using two different lengths brought it down a lot – and also allowed me to use 7 bits for pointing back. The new packer would thus only look for duplications of 2 byte sequences, and it could use the whole first 128 bytes as dictionary. I also gave it a bit more intelligence in how it sorted the priority on what to select for packing. This gave me not only a saving on the depacker – the packer was now able to save 46 bytes in total on the data! Even more than the supposedly more capable version.
Here’s what the depacker looks like, in both 68000 assembler as well as machine code. As you can see, it’s 26 bytes in size (excluding the setup of video memory in A1 and source data in A0).
41FA 004A lea _text(pc),a0 47D0 lea (a0),a3 303C 00A3 move.w #_textend-_text-1,d0 ; our packed byte array length .l1: 1418 move.b (a0)+,d20881 0007 bclr #7,d1 6708 beq.s .notrep ; if <$80 then it's not a lookup value 12F3 1000 move.b (a3,d1.w),(a1)+ 1233 1001 move.b 1(a3,d1.w),d1 ; saves a bra.s6A08 bpl.s .notrep ; if positive then not a lookup value 12F3 2080 move.b $80(a3,d2.w),(a1)+ ; Offset to ignore high/negative bit 1433 2081 move.b $81(a3,d2.w),d2 ; -"- and saves a bra.s .notrep: 12C2 move.b d2,(a1)+ 51C8 FFEC dbf d0,.l1
The total saving is thus 210-(164+26) = 20 bytes, or 10%. Adding back the 58 bytes of other code, plus handling of a temporary depack space, ended up at 260 bytes.
Oh, wait. 260? That’s … 4 bytes too much. Now, I had already taken the time to create some better “movement” in the screen, doing split rasters from a random seed, and I really didn’t want to scale back on that again. So, the final trick used is borrowed from another code magician of the past – Gunstick of ULM. Last year he found a way to make the 32 byte operating system header 4 bytes smaller, and since the whole point of the demo scene is to cheat as much as possible without it being obvious, that’s how come the A Link Between Worlds entry by SYNC at Sommarhack 2021 came in at the expected 288 bytes executable size.
added 2021-07-14: Ben’s optimization removed 4 bytes and thus the entry would not have needed the header-hack. This is a great example of how, when sizecoding, every single trick in the book is used to shrink the code. Ben makes use of the fact that the high bit (bit 8) is also the negative bit in a byte. Instead of clearing the high bit and jumping on whether it was set or not, as my code did previously, it’s possible to jump directly on whether the previous move.b contained a negative or positive byte. Since we don’t clear the high bit, we then need to offset the following moves with 128 and 129 (same as -128 and -127) on our index. The depack code thus now stands at 22 bytes in size.
If there’s interest, I might clean up the packer and release as well. However, unless you have an extremely similar custom use case you’ll probably be better off using lz77 directly. I’ve heard rumours of such a depacker on the 68000 at just double the size of mine.
(Did I win? Of course not – in true SYNC spirit I only cared about the tech challenge. The other entries had COOL MOVING STUFF – and the winner even had sound! You really should go check them out.)
Stiga SD 98 ride-on lawnmower repair and mod
(Also includes how to seriously mess something up creating even bigger repair needs)
When we bought our property we also purchased a lot of the equipment the previous owner had acquired. An integral part of that is the lawnmower tractor – total size is close to two acres and most of that is covered with grass. It’s a Hurricane HTG 98 SD, which is a model also sold under many other brands. In Sweden the most known one would probably be Stiga SD 98, but in the UK it’s likely an MTD. It has a Briggs & Stratton 17.5HP engine and does a pretty good job, we use it also to transport things around, collect leaves and tidy up the driveway gravel.
A week ago it suddenly wouldn’t start. It’s been a bit finicky since we got it, but no matter what I tried it simply didn’t even engage the starter. This points to an electrical issue, right up my alley. Or so you would think. I have degrees in Mechanical Engineering and Software Engineering, but all the electronics stuff I blog about is all self taught.
I also looked forward to tearing it down. Like other ride-ons, it has a safety switch where the engine cuts out immediately when it doesn’t detect a driver in the seat. This is all good and well, I really understand why, but when you have a huge lawn there’s just no way you can walk around in preparation for mowing, getting rid of all small rocks, large twigs and the constantly falling pears and apples now during the autumn. I really need to be able to keep it running while quickly moving things out of the way.
Since I had a hunch that the reason it didn’t start was another one of the safety switches, I stripped it down and started to search for both where they originated, and where the mower made the decision to whether it was safe to engage the engine or not. Also, to figure out which one it was that was currently not enabling.
From experience, I knew that there were at least three safety signals that are all needed for the mower to start: Driver in the seat, gearbox in neutral and cutting blades not engaged.
I decided to work backwards. This component is found next to the starter. Red is always 12V, the starter gets GND from a place not pictured, and I figured the two white cables would go to 12V when the key was turned to ignition. They never were. However, I could clearly hear a clicking sound as the key was turned to pre-ignition, so next my attention was turned to what that could be. (This component, btw, is a rectifier. It supplies DC power from the AC power generated by the engine, used to charge the battery. I was way off on its purpose there).
This is a breakout coming from the ignition key. White is 12V when the key is turned to ignition, red and brown are powered when the key is switched to pre-ignition. My model doesn’t have front lights, but from that I learned I can add them as a future mod. In the background you can see the solenoid, which is the component that does the clicking. It’s a relay, taking 12V directly from the battery with a high capacity cable, allowing current to pass through when the purple wire is powered (black is GND).
And, indeed, the purple wire never went to VCC when the ignition key was turned. Since I had already seen that the white wire from the breakout did, I manually connected these together and verified that the starter engaged and the engine came to life. I now definitely knew that the issue was somewhere in when “white went purple”, which most likely was where the safety signals converged as well.
What do you know, that looks interesting. Beneath the steering wheel is a little black box with electronics. Opening it up, we can see some familiar colours:
Red and blue in opposite corners are VCC. The larger gauge purple (yes, they are different) goes to the solenoid, the smaller gauge purple is a combination of the gear box signal and the driver seat signal. Blue’s ignition key and grey comes from the cutting blades engager. Maybe I also mixed them up when trying to remember – sorry. The two takeaways for my purposes is that I could measure these and see that the problem was with the push button enabling the cutting blades and also that I only had a combined signal for two of the safety conditions. And there’s no way I would want to mod the tractor so that it could be started while in gear.
I removed the button, separated the connectors below, cleaned out any corrosion with electronics cleaning spray and put it back together. Now it was time to get to work on that driver’s seat safety switch I had in mind. I wanted to hide (we have kids) a little toggle switch somewhere so I could selectively have the function enabled or not. Interestingly, when searching for if someone had done this before, I only found videos from other tractors where this wire was easily spotted underneath the seat – but that isn’t the case here. It turns out, the detection is done underneath the bodywork, where the springs attach to the frame.
Alright, there’s the connector. VCC on one wire, and when the driver is seated it simply connects them together. Wiring up a switch here is easy, connect in parallell and short them together for the override function.
Uh oh.
That’s … not good. That’s the main drive belt from the engine to the gearbox. Somehow I had managed to catch this just in time before it broke completely – and with everything torn down already! I stopped thinking about the override switch and went to order a replacement belt.
*a few days later*
Ok. So, I had already changed the cutting deck belt some weeks earlier, so how hard could it be? The belt simply wraps around some pulleys and then …
… hmm. It needs to get to that top pulley. And there’s something in the way of that, so it seems I would need to move the lower pulley and that other thing out of the way first.
That ‘other thing’ is a PTO brake, I learned. When engaged it magnetically engages a brake on the drive shaft. Good stuff. I watched some more youtube videos and all I had to do was to remove the nut and it and the pulleys should slide down. Well, yeah. In the ideal world of Youtube. No matter how hard I pulled, even with careful use of a lever (so as not to bend the shaft) they were completely stuck.
This is where I would go down the wrong rabbit hole and seriously start messing things up. I blame lack of sleep, overwork, having three small kids and the phase of the moon.
It seemed possible to attack the shaft from the other end, so I opened up the engine cover and pulled the nut from the flywheel. My thinking here was that if I removed the flywheel, somehow that would aid me in just moving the shaft the centimeter or so needed to thread the drive belt around the guides. But just as the pulleys, the flywheel didn’t budge. And so I turned my attention to four screws on the side of the flywheel. Now, I’m of the mindset that most things you disassemble you can put together again, so I didn’t spend any time thinking about what they could be for – just that they might be the ones stopping my progress. One of the bolts came out easily, but the next three just immediately sheared. So I started drilling them out, which worked well for one of them but not the other.
At this point, I did notice that when I turned the flywheel, there was a noise I hadn’t heard before. Also, I started thinking about my knowledge of, and lack of knowledge of, flywheels.
I decided the stop messing with the flywheel, and instead see if there might be some youtube videos showing me how to pull pulleys. I had searched for how to replace a drive belt, of course, but none of them had this PTO brake and they all had it easy where they could just slide the belt either over the lower pulley, or their models had engine mounts that could be moved back and forth.
Some better search terminology and off to the hardware store to buy a three-armed puller. It took all of five minutes to then get the pulleys and PTO brake off. I had spent the better part of a day on this problem already, so I was filled with joy. Another five minutes and the belt was in place. Some quick connections and the battery temporarily in place and it was time to start the engine. I wasn’t too bothered with the two bolts I had removed from the flywheel, it seemed securely in place and I had also bought replacement bolts I could put back.
The starter engaged and I heard a big clonking sound and that was it. The positives: I had fixed the original problem, and I had a new drive belt. The negatives: The engine was dead.
Now I decided to freshen up my knowledge of flywheels. My teenage years as a souped-up thirteen-horsepower-moped gangsta all came back to me and I realized I had most likely loosened magnets on the inside of the flywheel, and they were now grinding down getting stuck. I had my finger on the button for a new 200 euro flywheel. Went to sleep.
The next morning I tried to use the puller to lift the flywheel, but that was a no-go. There are two threaded holes for some speciality equipment for this, but it wasn’t something I could find in my local stores and I was getting real tired of this tractor. I found some bush-fix suggestions where you levered some slight tension upwards and then whacked the shaft (protected by the nut) with the biggest hammer you have. Well, I have an enormous sledge hammer. Five whacks later, and the flywheel came off.
Positives: My restored knowledge about flywheels had lead me to the correct conclusion. Negatives: Those metal plates protecting the magnets were bent out of their original shape – and these rotate around fixed magnets at the tiniest of surface to surface gaps needing to be pretty perfect to work.
A lot of careful whacks and taps with a hammer later, and some drilling, I had managed to produce what actually looked pretty good. This picture was taken before I dremeled the bolts down to level though, but you get the idea.
I mounted everything back together and was greeted by a perfectly running engine. You should see the grin on my face. I had messed this up – badly – but managed to save it.
Alright, back to that safety switch.
This is where I decided to connect up my switch in parallel. If you inspect your SD 98 from the right side, you’ll see some wiring tubes coming from the rear to the middle. One of them has three wires: red, orange and gray. Red is VCC, orange is the seat safety and gray is the gearbox safety. That’s probably the easiest places to do this mod, not requiring any teardown of bodywork at all – but hey – I had already done it.
… and here’s how it looks, finally mounted in place. Easily reachable if you know where to look for it, and hopefully something the kids won’t figure out until they’re old enough to be trusted with it.
Oh, and the mower runs better than ever. I took the time to lubricate wherever suitable as I went along, and I cleaned out a lot of assorted junk from various places as well. I even think the motor sounds better, but that’s maybe wishful thinking.
-“Troed, you should have your own Youtube channel for all of this instead of blog posts!”
No thanks. I absolutely hate having to wade through someone waffling about when all I want is to quickly get to what the solution I searched for is. If you came here looking for how to mod the driver’s safety on a Stiga/HTG/MTD/etc – aren’t you glad you didn’t have to? :)
Hooked on hookes
Above you see two probes that came with my DSLogic Analyzer. You also see two EZ-Hook XKM-S probes bought from Digikey at 30 SEK each. The latter are vastly higher quality – and much easier to work with since you can place them closer together due to their thinner tips.
Highly recommended.
Converting DSLogic Basic to Plus
I bought a DSLogic Basic USB Logic Analyzer a few years back. It has worked perfectly fine for my use cases. Recently I’ve begun using a Ubuntu desktop more than my Macbook laptops in the workshop, and when it came to installing the DSView software I stumbled upon the weird fact that DreamSourceLab seem to consider their old products unsupported, and they cannot use any newer version than 0.99.
While figuring this out (no, it’s not spelled out anywhere I can see when downloading the software) I stumbled upon some forum threads detailing how the only difference between DSLogic Basic and DSLogic Plus is 256Mbit RAM and changed values in an EEPROM.
The RAM chip (MT48LC16M16A2P-6A) is $1.5 imported from China, or $10 from within Europe. I went with LittleDiode in the UK and had it in just a few days.
8 screws later.
Apply solder paste.
While using the hot air station to melt the paste, also remove the eeprom.
The previously modded TL866 works just fine to read out what was in my case an ST M24128.
Search and replace 0E 2A 21 00 for 0E 2A 20 00 (two places). Can be done directly in the MiniPro software. Write back the changed contents to the eeprom and put it back in.
Congratulations! You now have a DSLogic Plus.
Look at that massive capture buffer. I have absolutely no idea what I will ever need it for.
Oh, and no. The DSLogic Plus with this hardware revision isn’t supported by anything newer than v0.99 of the DSView software either – which was what I was hoping for. Oh well.
Wireless phone charger – Tesla
Love the Tesla Model 3. When I got it I thought the clever way to route a charger cable up from the front USB ports was nice, but after a while I got real tired of having to poke the phone onto the plug whenever I got in the car.
The Tesla M3 subreddit had a thread about adding Qi wireless phone charging to the front compartment, and there seemed to be no real competition to the product from TapTes. I’ve now had it installed for a few days and it really is completely seamless. Whenever I place the phone down in the car it charges, and the installation was relatively straight forward.
On my commute is a section of freeway that’s often backed up. I let Autopilot deal with that, while I go on working through the phone (of course hands-free, officer!). Topping it up whenever possible becomes a must.
Now I just need to find some way of wirelessly charging the Tesla itself.
Stock, with a third party 90 degree angled charger cable.
The new charger plate with its USB power cables fitting the stock holes down into the compartment.
Qi charger plate installed, still without the stock bottom slide cover.
I keep my car messy. It’s a vehicle, not a showroom. Anyway, this photo shows their Y-cable solution where you still have access to two front USB ports even though they also power the wireless charger. Also in this image is a Raspberry Pi Zero running the awesome teslausb sync-thingie.
I scratched my head for a while trying to use my iPhone to take a photo of my iPhone being wirelessly charged, but had to give up and use a Huawei. In reality this looks good.
it's in my head 